오늘의 트렌드로 돌아가기: 모나코, 프라이부르크를 3-0으로 꺾고 컨퍼런스 리그 2연승
Poly 랭킹 · 오늘의 트렌드에서

2026 컨퍼런스 리그 순위: Elo 점수보다 잘하는 클럽 10곳

8개 클럽이 두 경기를 모두 이겼습니다. 이 중 Club Elo 기준 유럽 50위 안에 드는 곳은 모나코뿐입니다. 약 340위인 하이두크 스플리트는 아약스를 이겼습니다.

  • 1위: Lugano
  • 10개 순위

01최종 목록

선도 AI들이 각자 독립적으로 열 개짜리 목록을 만들었습니다. 확인하기 쉬운 하나의 결과입니다. 모든 순위에는 이유, 출처, 그 항목을 넣은 AI 목록이 있습니다.

순서: AI의 동의가 많은 항목부터 적은 항목 순입니다.

밝은 배지는 해당 AI가 이 항목을 자기 목록에 넣었다는 뜻이고, 흐린 배지는 넣지 않았다는 뜻입니다.

  1. 1

    Lugano

    Elo 1,650–1,664점이고 선수단 가치는 4,500만 유로로, 브라이턴의 약 15분의 1입니다. 그래도 8골을 넣었습니다. Elo 1,698점인 헤타페 원정에서 5-2로 이긴 경기를 포함해, 완벽한 출발을 한 팀 중 가장 많은 골입니다.

    포함함: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Grok, Gemini, StepFun, DeepSeek.

    각 AI 목록에서의 순위: Claude: 5 · ChatGPT: 2 · Meta: 3 · Grok: 3 · Gemini: 1 · StepFun: 1 · DeepSeek: 1

    각 AI가 짚은 점 7
    • Claude5위

      Eight goals in two games, including a 5-2 win at Getafe, from a side with an Elo of 1664.

      출처 ↗
    • ChatGPT2위

      Five goals away to Getafe, after already beating Crvena Zvezda, made this one of the round's most striking attacking performances.

    • Meta3위

      8 goals in 2 games leads competition, 5-2 at Getafe after trailing — most over xG

    • Grok3위

      8 goals in two games, including 5-2 demolition of Getafe

      출처 ↗
    • Gemini1위

      Scored 8 goals from an expected goals figure of barely 3.1 xG, including 5 past La Liga's Getafe in Madrid to sit atop the table.

      출처 ↗
    • StepFun1위

      Conceded after 108 seconds at Getafe and won 5-2 — with a €45.23m squad.

    • DeepSeek1위

      Eight goals and six points from a club Elo ranks 181st — the loudest overrun in the league phase.

      출처 ↗
    AI 7개가 이 순위로 선택
    출처 ↗
  2. 2

    Hajduk Split

    Club Elo는 약 1,599점으로 평가하며, 유럽 332위–344위입니다. 그래도 약 90–100점 높은 아약스를 이겼고, 이어 툰 원정에서도 이겼습니다. UEFA 순위는 198위에 불과합니다.

    포함함: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Grok, Gemini, StepFun, DeepSeek.

    각 AI 목록에서의 순위: Claude: 3 · ChatGPT: 7 · Meta: 2 · Grok: 8 · Gemini: 3 · StepFun: 4 · DeepSeek: 2

    각 AI가 짚은 점 7
    • Claude3위

      Beat Ajax 2-1 on matchday 1 with an Elo of 1599, nearly 100 points below them.

      출처 ↗
    • ChatGPT7위

      After upsetting Ajax in the opener, Hajduk won 1–0 away at Thun: two wins without needing a goal avalanche.

    • Meta2위

      Beat Ajax 2-1 on MD1 as Elo outsider, now 6 pts with only 3 goals scored — efficiency over xG

    • Grok8위

      Two narrow wins and +2 GD from Croatian side

      출처 ↗
    • Gemini3위

      Shocked Dutch heavyweights Ajax 2-1 before edging Thun 1-0, surviving a combined 4.1 xG conceded while allowing only 1 goal.

      출처 ↗
    • StepFun4위

      A 1,595-rated club beat a side 91 Elo points higher — and 59th on UEFA's coefficient.

    • DeepSeek2위

      Six points with three goals and one conceded; the 2-1 win over Ajax was a 47% Elo shot.

      출처 ↗
    AI 7개가 이 순위로 선택
    출처 ↗
  3. 3

    Panathinaikos

    Elo 약 1,660점(190위–204위)으로 7-2를 기록해 순위표 선두에 올랐습니다. xG는 논란입니다. 한 집계는 약 7.5(만들어 낸 기회)라고 하고, 다른 집계는 약 3.3(높은 결정력)이라고 합니다.

    포함함: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Grok, Gemini, StepFun, DeepSeek.

    각 AI 목록에서의 순위: Claude: 8 · ChatGPT: 1 · Meta: 5 · Grok: 2 · Gemini: 4 · StepFun: 2 · DeepSeek: 5

    각 AI가 짚은 점 7
    • Claude8위

      Scored 5 at Kairat Almaty on matchday 2 (7 goals in the phase) from an Elo of 1662.

      출처 ↗
    • ChatGPT1위

      A 5–1 away win turned two opening victories into a six-point statement, with five goals scored in Kazakhstan alone.

    • Meta5위

      Top of table on GD +5 after 5-1 at Kairat — 7 goals from ∼3.5 xG

    • Grok2위

      Top of the table on goal difference after 7-2 aggregate including 5-1 away rout

    • Gemini4위

      Racked up 7 goals from only 3.25 xG across two matches, capped by a 5-1 away demolition of Kairat Almaty.

    • StepFun2위

      Top of a 36-team table on an Elo of 1,654 — and 5-1 in Almaty.

    • DeepSeek5위

      Seven goals but 7.5 xG — the perfect start is volume, not overfinishing.

      출처 ↗
    AI 7개가 이 순위로 선택
    출처 ↗
  4. 4

    Trabzonspor

    Elo 1,687점(144위–150위)인데, UEFA의 5년 계수로는 169위에 그쳐 느린 계산식이 너무 낮게 평가했습니다. 살라는 하츠를 2-0으로 이긴 경기에서 골과 도움을 기록했습니다.

    포함함: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Grok, Gemini, StepFun, DeepSeek.

    각 AI 목록에서의 순위: Claude: 4 · ChatGPT: 5 · Meta: 6 · Grok: 5 · Gemini: 6 · StepFun: 3 · DeepSeek: 7

    각 AI가 짚은 점 7
    • Claude4위

      Elo 1687 (rank 150) yet 6 goals in 2 games, including 4-2 away at KuPS.

      출처 ↗
    • ChatGPT5위

      A second win came with a clean sheet and a goal plus an assist from Mohamed Salah.

    • Meta6위

      Perfect 6 pts with Salah 150th UEFA game, beat Hearts 2-0 despite 78% Elo favourite tag

    • Grok5위

      Back-to-back wins including 2-0 over Hearts with Salah involved

    • Gemini6위

      Vaulted past an UEFA coefficient ranking of 112th to post back-to-back multi-goal wins, including a 2-0 shutout of Scottish side Hearts.

      출처 ↗
    • StepFun3위

      Six goals in two games from a €184.30m squad rated 150th in Europe.

    • DeepSeek7위

      Six points with six goals; UEFA's 169th-ranked side is outrunning its coefficient, not its Elo.

      출처 ↗
    AI 7개가 이 순위로 선택
    출처 ↗
  5. 5

    Sint-Truiden

    Elo 1,617점(261위–292위)인데도 1,708–1,720점인 미트윌란 원정에서 1-0으로 이겼습니다. 승점 6점에 실점은 0점입니다. UEFA 순위는 143위인지 73위인지 논란입니다.

    포함함: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek. 포함하지 않음: StepFun.

    각 AI 목록에서의 순위: Claude: 2 · ChatGPT: 8 · Meta: 1 · Grok: 7 · Gemini: 2 · DeepSeek: 4

    각 AI가 짚은 점 6
    • Claude2위

      Elo 1617 (rank 292) and two wins with a clean sheet in both: 3-0 on goals.

      출처 ↗
    • ChatGPT8위

      A 1–0 win away at Midtjylland followed a 2–0 opener: six points and three goals conceded by neither opponent.

    • Meta1위

      Elo 261st vs Midtjylland 110th, yet 1-0 away win — 6 pts from two games ranked 73rd by UEFA

    • Grok7위

      Clean-sheet double and 3-0 aggregate for Belgian mid-table club

      출처 ↗
    • Gemini2위

      Carried a 135th-tier UEFA coefficient to consecutive clean-sheet victories against Midtjylland and Iberia, defying an Elo expected haul of just 1.8 points.

    • DeepSeek4위

      Six points from two games with only three goals — the purest points-over-rating start in the division.

      출처 ↗
    AI 6개가 이 순위로 선택
    출처 ↗
  6. 6

    Brann

    완벽한 출발을 한 8개 팀 중 Elo가 가장 낮은 1,576점으로, 유럽 390위–406위 수준입니다. 하지만 두 경기 상대는 이 조에서 가장 낮게 평가받는 팀들이었습니다. 1라운드 xG(+1.5)만 있습니다.

    포함함: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek. 포함하지 않음: StepFun.

    각 AI 목록에서의 순위: Claude: 1 · ChatGPT: 3 · Meta: 4 · Grok: 4 · Gemini: 5 · DeepSeek: 8

    각 AI가 짚은 점 6
    • Claude1위

      Elo 1576 (rank 406 on the Norway-page snapshot) and 6 points from 2 games, with 6 goals scored and 2 conceded.

      출처 ↗
    • ChatGPT3위

      A 4–1 away victory featured the league phase's first hat-trick, making Brann's second-round response impossible to dismiss as a narrow escape.

    • Meta4위

      6 goals, first hat-trick of phase by Noah Holm, from Norwegian pot 4

    • Grok4위

      Two wins and +4 GD from Norway's mid-table side

    • Gemini5위

      Collected maximum points and 6 goals against Lincoln Red Imps and Kauno Žalgiris, nearly doubling their 3.3 Elo-projected points tally.

    • DeepSeek8위

      Six points from a club ranked 389th by Elo — the widest rating gap in the perfect-start group.

      출처 ↗
    AI 6개가 이 순위로 선택
    출처 ↗
  7. 7

    Twente

    Elo 1,660–1,667점(177위–192위)에 승점 6점, 골은 5-1입니다. FotMob은 1라운드 뒤 xG 차이가 +2.2라고 봤습니다. 기회를 많이 만든 것이 이 출발을 뒷받침합니다.

    포함함: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek. 포함하지 않음: StepFun.

    각 AI 목록에서의 순위: Claude: 7 · ChatGPT: 6 · Meta: 7 · Grok: 6 · Gemini: 7 · DeepSeek: 6

    각 AI가 짚은 점 6
    • Claude7위

      6 points and 5-1 on goals from an Elo of 1667, with Thun beaten 1-0 on matchday 1.

      출처 ↗
    • ChatGPT6위

      A 4–1 away win over Lincoln Red Imps backed up a clean-sheet opening victory, giving Twente a strong early goal difference.

    • Meta7위

      Two wins to nil conceded — only club with Brighton on 0 goals against, from pot 3

    • Grok6위

      Perfect start and +4 GD from Dutch side many rated mid-pack

      출처 ↗
    • Gemini7위

      Turned an Elo expectation of 3.8 points into 6 full points with a +4 differential, outscoring their xG expectation by 1.9 goals.

    • DeepSeek6위

      Six points, five goals and one conceded; the Elo gap says this is no fluke.

      출처 ↗
    AI 6개가 이 순위로 선택
    출처 ↗
  8. 8

    FC Copenhagen

    Elo가 약 21점 낮은데도(1,695점 대 1,716점) 브라가를 3-0으로 이겼습니다. 1라운드에서는 xG 1.56으로 3골을 넣어, 골 결정력이 만든 기회보다 좋았습니다.

    포함함: Claude, Grok, Gemini, StepFun, DeepSeek. 포함하지 않음: ChatGPT, Meta.

    각 AI 목록에서의 순위: Claude: 10 · Grok: 10 · Gemini: 10 · StepFun: 7 · DeepSeek: 9

    각 AI가 짚은 점 5
    • Claude10위

      Drew 2-2 away at Red Star Belgrade after a 3-0 win over Braga, and holds 4 points on 5 goals.

      출처 ↗
    • Grok10위

      Unbeaten with +3 GD after drawing with Red Star

    • Gemini10위

      Swept tournament favorites Braga 3-0 and secured a 2-2 draw at Red Star, converting 5 goals from 2.7 xG.

    • StepFun7위

      Won 3-0 at a Braga side ClubElo rates 21 points above them.

    • DeepSeek9위

      Five goals from two games, including three from 1.56 xG in the opener — hot finishing without a perfect record.

      출처 ↗
    AI 5개가 이 순위로 선택
    출처 ↗
  9. 9

    Monaco

    이 질문에 답하자면, Elo 1,795점(유럽 47위)으로 이 대회에서 세 번째로 높아서 승점 6점은 그 평가에 맞습니다. 프라이부르크를 3-0으로 이긴 경기는 xG 1.10–1.27에 불과했습니다.

    포함함: ChatGPT, Meta, Grok, StepFun, DeepSeek. 포함하지 않음: Claude, Gemini.

    각 AI 목록에서의 순위: ChatGPT: 4 · Meta: 8 · Grok: 1 · StepFun: 6 · DeepSeek: 3

    각 AI가 짚은 점 5
    • ChatGPT4위

      Two wins included a 3–0 defeat of last season's Europa League runners-up Freiburg, a result with a stronger opponent-quality signal than a routine victory.

      출처 ↗
    • Meta8위

      3-0 vs Freiburg on Oct 22, 5-1 aggregate — Elo 1713 but UEFA ranks it only 51st

    • Grok1위

      Perfect 6 pts and 5-1 GD after thrashing last season's runners-up Freiburg 3-0

      출처 ↗
    • StepFun6위

      The only six-point side whose rating already said they belong — 1,795, 47th in Europe.

    • DeepSeek3위

      3-0 against Freiburg from 1.25 xG — the most clinical perfect start in the league phase.

      출처 ↗
    AI 5개가 이 순위로 선택
    출처 ↗
  10. 10

    Universitatea Craiova

    승점 4점으로 4경기 무패 행진 중입니다. Elo 1,591점이며, Elo 1,698점인 헤타페와 비긴 경기도 포함됩니다. UEFA 순위는 182위입니다. Elo 수치는 한 곳에서만 나온 것입니다.

    포함함: Claude, Meta, Gemini, DeepSeek. 포함하지 않음: ChatGPT, Grok, StepFun.

    각 AI 목록에서의 순위: Claude: 6 · Meta: 10 · Gemini: 8 · DeepSeek: 10

    각 AI가 짚은 점 4
    • Claude6위

      Elo 1591: unbeaten with 4 points, including a 3-1 win away at Inter Club d'Escaldes.

      출처 ↗
    • Meta10위

      4 pts from 2, beat Inter Escaldes 3-1 away — UEFA rank 182 but outruns Elo

    • Gemini8위

      Stole an away point at Getafe and defeated Inter Escaldes 3-1 to collect 4 points, outperforming their 150th UEFA seed projection.

      출처 ↗
    • DeepSeek10위

      Four points and five goals from a club UEFA ranks 182nd — the quiet overrun outside the perfect-start queue.

    AI 4개가 이 순위로 선택
    출처 ↗

상위 3위 더 알아보기 ↓

02상위 3위 더 알아보기

순위는 위에 있습니다. 여기서는 상위 세 곳이 무엇인지, 왜 여기 있는지, 알아 둘 만한 것을 소개합니다.

Elo figures come from different days and trackers, so they are ranges, and xG estimates differ between trackers. Each club has played only two games.

1Lugano

1위 — Lugano. 7개 AI 중 7개의 목록에 포함; 그 안의 중간 순위: 2. Most goals of any perfect start: eight in two games, including 5-2 at Getafe, from a €45m squad.

Lugano from Sighignola
Aconcagua · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons
Flowers and lake Lugano
Obomon · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

알고 계셨나요

  • In April 2003 Lugano went bankrupt. The club was re-founded and restarted in the fifth tier. It took the name FC Lugano back in 2008, for its 100th birthday, and returned to the Swiss top flight in 2015.

    출처 ↗ ✓ 여러 AI가 확인
무엇인가
Swiss club with a €45m squad and two wins from two games.
강점
Most goals of the three: 8, against 7 and 3.
알아 두면 좋은 사람
Useful to know: a small-budget side can outscore a La Liga club.
  • Points vs Club EloElo 1,650–1,664
  • 본사티치노주

위키백과 · Wikidata

여기 있는 이유

  • Lugano won 5-2 at Getafe on 22 October, after trailing 1-0 in the 2nd minute. They had 8 goals in two games, more than Panathinaikos (7) and Hajduk (3), while sitting second on goal difference.

    출처 ↗

  • After beating Red Star Belgrade 3-2 in the opener, Lugano are unbeaten in 20 matches this season. Getafe, finished seventh in Spain last season, had gone ten matches without a win.

    출처 ↗
유의할 점

  • Croci-Torti says his "toughest task" is keeping the players grounded. He stresses the team must stay focused, especially before the away match at Thun. A run like this is hard to keep going.

    출처 ↗
더 알아보기

  • Open the club's own history page and read the timeline from 1908 onward. First look at the 1951 opening of the Cornaredo stadium and the Swiss titles of 1938, 1941 and 1949.

    출처 ↗

동영상: Why Lugano is Switzerland’s Best-Kept Secret (영어) · Alessandro Palombo

상위 3위 비교 ↓

2Hajduk Split

2위 — Hajduk Split. 7개 AI 중 7개의 목록에 포함; 그 안의 중간 순위: 3. They beat Ajax, rated about 100 Elo points higher, then won at Thun, though they are only about 340th in Europe.

Split - Building with paint of Hajduk Split
Ludovic Péron · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons

알고 계셨나요

  • Hajduk's story starts in Prague. Students from Split watched a Slavia–Sparta match, then met in the U Fleků tavern and talked of a club at home. Hajduk was founded in Split on 13 February 1911.

    출처 ↗
무엇인가
Croatian club from Split, rated about 340th in Europe.
강점
Lowest Elo of the three (1,599), yet six points, including a win over Ajax.
알아 두면 좋은 사람
Useful to know: narrow wins can beat the ratings without many goals.
  • Points vs Club EloElo 1,599, about 340th
  • 본사스플리트, 스플리트달마티아주

위키백과 · Wikidata

여기 있는 이유

  • Hajduk beat Ajax 2-1 in their league-phase debut. It was their first win in a major European competition since September 2010, a gap of 16 years.

    출처 ↗

  • Hajduk have 6 points from 2 games but only 3 goals scored and 1 conceded. They are 8th, the lowest of the three. They win narrowly, while Lugano (8 goals) and Panathinaikos (7) score far more.

    출처 ↗
역사

  • In early 2008 Hajduk was facing bankruptcy. A sporting law turned the club into a joint-stock company. Fans bought many shares, and the City of Split and local businesspeople added money.

    출처 ↗
유의할 점

  • Hajduk supporters set off fireworks in the 75th minute and stopped the game. Coach Gonzalo García apologised to Ajax and UEFA afterwards.

    출처 ↗

  • Before the match, Hajduk fans were reported chanting antisemitic and pro-Nazi slogans. Arrests followed, and Croatian leaders criticised it. The club's results are one story, and the crowd's behaviour is a separate, serious one.

    출처 ↗
사람들의 말

  • They were really up for it; they went all out. We couldn't match that. — Youri Baas (Ajax)

    출처 ↗
더 알아보기

  • Book the stadium tour to visit Poljud, the club's home since 1979. Ask the guide about the stadium's 1979 opening, when it was built for the Mediterranean Games.

    출처 ↗

동영상: We Won't Do What You Tell Us | The Hajduk Split Story (영어) · COPA90

상위 3위 비교 ↓

3Panathinaikos

3위 — Panathinaikos. 7개 AI 중 7개의 목록에 포함; 그 안의 중간 순위: 4. Top of the table with seven goals, including a 5-1 win away at Kairat, from a modest Elo.

Apostolos Nikolaidis Gate 13-14
The original uploader was Galis at German Wikipedia . · CC BY-SA 2.0 de · Wikimedia Commons

알고 계셨나요

  • On the way to that final, Panathinaikos lost 4-1 away at Red Star Belgrade. They won the return 3-0 in Athens, so they went through on away goals.

    출처 ↗
무엇인가
Greek club from Athens, rated near 1,660 by Club Elo.
강점
Best goal difference of the three: +5, against Lugano's +4 and Hajduk's +2.
알아 두면 좋은 사람
Useful to know: it shows how fast two games can lift a mid-rated club to first.
  • Points vs Club EloElo near 1,660
  • 본사아테네

위키백과 · Wikidata

여기 있는 이유

  • Panathinaikos lead the table with 6 points, 7 goals scored and 2 conceded (+5), the best goal difference of the three clubs. Lugano are +4 and Hajduk +2.

    출처 ↗
역사

  • After eight years without a league title, Panathinaikos won their 19th championship in 2004. It was decided in a tense finish, with a late goal from Emmanuel Olisadebe.

    출처 ↗
유의할 점

  • The 5-1 win came against Kairat, who "remains with one point" after two rounds. Two games is a very small sample, so the top spot says little about the whole season yet.

    출처 ↗

  • At home in the Greek league, Panathinaikos lost 0-1 at Olympiacos on 11 October 2026, their biggest defeat of the season so far. Their form is not perfect everywhere.

    출처 ↗
더 알아보기

  • Open the club's dated history entry on its founding on 3 February 1908 by Giorgos Kalafatis. Read it first, then browse other dated events in the history section.

    출처 ↗
ChatGPT이(가) 1위로 꼽았습니다. 그들이 본 것

  • ChatGPT: A 5–1 away win turned two opening victories into a six-point statement, with five goals scored in Kazakhstan alone.

동영상: How Panathinaikos Shut Down Fenerbahce | The Bonga Effect (영어) · BasketHead

상위 3위 비교 ↓

상위 3위 나란히 보기

LuganoHajduk SplitPanathinaikos
AI 목록 포함7 / 77 / 77 / 7
Points vs Club EloElo 1,650–1,664Elo 1,599, about 340thElo near 1,660
본사티치노주스플리트, 스플리트달마티아주아테네
1위로 꼽은 AIGemini, StepFun, DeepSeek—ChatGPT

AI 수가 같은 순위는 각 AI 목록에서의 평균 순위로 정렬했습니다.

다른 랭킹

03알아 둘 만한 것

AI들이 목록을 만들며 발견한 것.

8개 클럽이 두 경기 후 승점 6점입니다. 모나코(Elo 1,795점, 47위)만 유럽 상위권에 가깝고, 나머지 7곳은 모두 Club Elo 상위 140위 밖입니다.

발견한 AI:
포함함: Claude, StepFun. 포함하지 않음: ChatGPT, Meta, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek.
출처 ↗

득점과 xG를 비교하는 검증은 아직 제대로 할 수 없습니다. FBref가 Opta의 고급 데이터를 더 이상 싣지 않고, FotMob의 공개 수치도 1라운드에서 끊깁니다.

발견한 AI:
포함함: Claude, ChatGPT, StepFun. 포함하지 않음: Meta, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek.
출처 ↗

브라이턴은 1라운드 뒤 팀 xG 차이가 가장 좋았습니다(+4.1). 그런데 체코 원정에서 0-0으로 비기며 득점하지 못했습니다. 기회와 득점이 서로 다른 이야기를 하고 있습니다.

발견한 AI:
포함함: ChatGPT. 포함하지 않음: Claude, Meta, Grok, Gemini, StepFun, DeepSeek.
출처 ↗

04집계 방법

공식 없이 쉬운 말로.

1질문

Top 10 Conference League Clubs Whose Results Most Outrun Their Rating

2이 주제를 고른 이유

No single table puts points, xG and two rival strength ratings side by side, so the reader can see which strong starts are likely to last.

3적용 범위

UEFA Conference League 2026-27 league phase, after matchday 2 (October 22, 2026)

4살펴본 기준

  • Points won so far compared with the points the club's Club Elo rating predicted
  • Goals scored compared with expected goals (xG) created
  • Gap between the club's UEFA five-season coefficient rank and its current Club Elo rank
  • UEFA / Wikipedia league-phase table — Points, goals for and against after matchday 2 (22 Oct 2026)
  • Club Elo (clubelo.com) — Current strength rating and rank in Europe, updated after every domestic and European match
  • UEFA five-season club coefficient (Meet the teams guide) — Rank built only from European results, as of 14 September 2026
  • FotMob / ESPN (Opta-type xG) — Expected goals. The only open figures are from matchday 1 and from single matches. No full table exists after matchday 2.

5순위를 매긴 AI

선도 AI: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Grok, Gemini, StepFun, DeepSeek. 각 AI가 독립적으로 10위까지의 목록을 만들고 순위마다 출처를 밝혔습니다.

6순위를 정한 방법

AI마다 다르게 쓴 같은 항목은 하나로 셌습니다. 더 많은 AI가 목록에 넣고 더 높이 놓을수록 순위가 높아집니다. 'AI 합의'는 그 항목을 자기 목록에 넣은 AI의 수를 보여 줍니다. 출처는 AI가 직접 찾은 것뿐이며 사람이 추가한 것은 없습니다.