Back to the trend of the day: Gunmen fire at Tiger Shroff's car in Mumbai; three suspects caught (in Hindi)
Poly Rating · from the trend of the day

Y Plus Security Meaning 2026: How Public Figures Stay Safe

India's state cover runs from two armed guards (X) to 36–55 personnel (Z+), yet Shah Rukh Khan pays for his own Y+ detail, a reported ₹15 lakh a month.

  • No. 1: Home security: perimeter, CCTV, bulletproof glass, safe rooms
  • 10 places

01Final list

The leading AIs each built their own list of ten independently. Here is one result that is easy to check: every place has a reason, a source, and the list of AIs that included it.

Order: from most to least AI agreement.

A bright badge means this AI put the entry on its list. A dim badge means it did not.

  1. 1

    Home security: perimeter, CCTV, bulletproof glass, safe rooms

    The home is the most predictable target. Salman Khan's balcony got bulletproof glass about eight months after shots hit his building, and safe rooms cost $25,000–$200,000+.

    Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi, DeepSeek. Did not include: Meta, Nemotron, Wenxin.

    In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: see list · Gemini: see list · MiMo: see list · StepFun: 4 · Kimi: 7 · DeepSeek: see list

    What each AI noted 7
    • Claude

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • ChatGPT

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • Gemini

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • MiMo

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • StepFunplace 4

      Salman Khan's balcony got bulletproof glass roughly eight months after bullets were fired at his gate.

    • Kimiplace 7

      After Bandra, Salman Khan's balcony got bulletproof glass — the cheapest fix that would have changed the April 2024 outcome.

    • DeepSeek

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    7 AIs put it here
  2. 2

    Armoured cars

    It helps you survive an ambush rather than prevent one: about 30 seconds against small arms, per ASIS UK. Brazil registered more than 20,000 new armoured vehicles in 2023.

    Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi, DeepSeek. Did not include: Meta, Nemotron, Wenxin.

    In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: see list · Gemini: see list · MiMo: see list · StepFun: 3 · Kimi: 4 · DeepSeek: see list

    What each AI noted 7
    • Claude

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • ChatGPT

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • Gemini

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • MiMo

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • StepFunplace 3

      Brazil's middle class spent $660 million on bulletproof cars in one year — the country is the world's top producer of them.

      Source ↗
    • Kimiplace 4

      A B6 car stops the 7.62 mm rifle rounds used in the Rohit Shetty and Tiger Shroff attacks — for $150,000-$650,000.

      Source ↗
    • DeepSeek

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    7 AIs put it here
  3. 3

    Phone and digital privacy: private numbers, data-broker removal, SIM security

    Cheap and costs no physical privacy, but no study shows it works. Threats to Katrina Kaif and Ranvir Shorey still came by Instagram and email.

    Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi, DeepSeek. Did not include: Meta, Nemotron, Wenxin.

    In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: see list · Gemini: see list · MiMo: see list · StepFun: 9 · Kimi: 10 · DeepSeek: see list

    What each AI noted 7
    • Claude

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • ChatGPT

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • Gemini

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • MiMo

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • StepFunplace 9

      TRAI's DND app is free, and it is the only measure that addresses the calls and messages that usually come before the attack.

      Source ↗
    • Kimiplace 10

      The cheapest protection on the list — and the one that stops a fixer from buying a star's home address for a few dollars.

      Source ↗
    • DeepSeek

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    7 AIs put it here
  4. More about the top three ↓
  5. 4

    Private bodyguards and close-protection teams (privately paid)

    They adapt in real time but are expensive and always present: $150,000–$200,000 a year for a two-person US team, about six times an armoured car's yearly cost.

    Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi, DeepSeek. Did not include: Meta, Nemotron, Wenxin.

    In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: see list · Gemini: see list · MiMo: see list · StepFun: 1 · Kimi: 6 · DeepSeek: see list

    What each AI noted 7
    • Claude

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • ChatGPT

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • Gemini

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • MiMo

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • StepFunplace 1

      India prices the same bodyguard by threat level: two armed guards at X, 36 at Z+.

      Source ↗
    • Kimiplace 6

      The same protection, privately paid: £2.5M a year for Harry and Meghan's detail after the state cover ended.

    • DeepSeek

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    7 AIs put it here
  6. 5

    India X, Y and Y+ state cover (state-provided)

    Ranges from two armed guards (X) to about 11 personnel (Y+). The state usually pays, but Shah Rukh Khan pays for his own, and Y+ didn't stop shots hitting Salman Khan's building.

    Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi, DeepSeek. Did not include: Meta, Nemotron, Wenxin.

    In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: 4 · Gemini: see list · MiMo: see list · StepFun: 5 · Kimi: 1 · DeepSeek: see list

    What each AI noted 7
    • Claude

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • ChatGPTplace 4

      India’s 2,562 feature films in 2023 led WIPO’s country table, while Mumbai’s Numbeo safety score was 55.9.

    • Gemini

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • MiMo

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • StepFunplace 5

      Y+ means 11 people follow you everywhere; the state usually pays — except Shah Rukh Khan, who pays about Rs 15 lakh a month for his.

      Source ↗
    • Kimiplace 1

      Up to 55 personnel, 10+ commandos and 5+ bulletproof vehicles around the clock — the heaviest shield any film figure can hold.

      Source ↗
    • DeepSeek

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    7 AIs put it here
  7. 6

    Threat assessment and protective intelligence

    The cheapest layer, and it costs no privacy. Of 83 people who attacked or nearly attacked US public figures, over 40% had shown interest in assassination beforehand.

    Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, MiMo, StepFun, DeepSeek. Did not include: Meta, Nemotron, Kimi, Wenxin.

    In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: see list · Gemini: see list · MiMo: see list · StepFun: 2 · DeepSeek: see list

    What each AI noted 6
    • Claude

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • ChatGPT

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • Gemini

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • MiMo

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • StepFunplace 2

      The Secret Service investigated roughly 10,000 threat cases in a year, up 40% — the cheapest measure here is doing the most work.

      Source ↗
    • DeepSeek

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    6 AIs put it here
  8. 7

    India Z and Z+ state cover

    India's heaviest tier: 36 or 55 personnel depending on the source, 10+ commandos, an estimated ₹33 lakh a month, and 51 protectees in 2024.

    Included it: Claude, Gemini, MiMo, Kimi, DeepSeek. Did not include: ChatGPT, Meta, Nemotron, StepFun, Wenxin.

    In their lists: Claude: see list · Gemini: 7 · MiMo: see list · Kimi: 5 · DeepSeek: see list

    What each AI noted 5
    • Claude

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • Geminiplace 7

      Although the US ranks 3rd in film volume (876 features) and 1st in box office, Los Angeles ranks 4th in the world for EIU Digital Security yet drops to a 46.2 Numbeo Safety Index (53.9 Crime Index) due to street-level gun and property crime.

    • MiMo

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • Kimiplace 5

      Eleven personnel for roughly ₹15 lakh a month — the workhorse cover that actually protects most Indian film stars.

      Source ↗
    • DeepSeek

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    5 AIs put it here
  9. 8

    Head-of-state protection: US Secret Service, UK RaSP

    Near-total cover that film stars cannot buy: about 300 agents on a sitting US president and a $3.2 billion FY2025 budget, while the Met won't publish RaSP costs.

    Included it: Claude, Gemini, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi. Did not include: ChatGPT, Meta, Nemotron, DeepSeek, Wenxin.

    In their lists: Claude: 4 · Gemini: 8 · MiMo: 4 · StepFun: see list · Kimi: 2

    What each AI noted 5
    • Claudeplace 4

      Hollywood makes 544 films a year, about a fifth of India's output, in a city where residents feel less safe than in Mumbai (46.2).

    • Geminiplace 8

      Generating 258 feature films a year and tying for 15th in the EIU Safe Cities Index, London suffers a sharp perception gap where street theft pushes its Numbeo Crime Index to 55.0 (Safety Index 45.0)—worse than both Los Angeles and Mumbai.

    • MiMoplace 4

      97 homicides in 2025 — 1.1 per 100,000, under half of New York's 2.8 — in the city that doubles as Hollywood's backlot.

      Source ↗
    • StepFun

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • Kimiplace 2

      Roughly 300 agents on a sitting president — but the service protects officeholders and candidates, not celebrities by choice.

      Source ↗
    5 AIs put it here
  10. 9

    Advance work, route changes and secure routines

    A changed route costs almost nothing. Shroff's attackers knew his Sunday football routine and waited about 45 minutes, yet only 41% of organisations send advance agents.

    Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, Kimi, DeepSeek. Did not include: Meta, Gemini, Nemotron, MiMo, StepFun, Wenxin.

    In their lists: Claude: see list · ChatGPT: see list · Kimi: 9 · DeepSeek: see list

    What each AI noted 4
    • Claude

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • ChatGPT

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • Kimiplace 9

      The attackers who hit Tiger Shroff knew his Sunday football routine — advance work is the layer that breaks that knowledge.

      Source ↗
    • DeepSeek

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    4 AIs put it here
  11. 10

    Legal protection: injunctions, privacy law, restraining orders

    Costs a court fee and no privacy, but stops no shooter. Delhi High Court protected Aishwarya Rai Bachchan's name, face and voice, and French law penalises paparazzi intrusions that US law allows.

    Included it: MiMo, StepFun. Did not include: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Gemini, Nemotron, Kimi, DeepSeek, Wenxin.

    In their lists: MiMo: see list · StepFun: 10

    What each AI noted 2
    • MiMo

      Named differently in its own list: open the full list.

      see list
    • StepFunplace 10

      A Delhi court gave Aishwarya Rai Bachchan an ex-parte injunction over her name, face and voice: paper armour against deepfakes, not bullets.

    2 AIs put it here

02More about the top three

The ranking is above. Here is more about the three places at the top: what they are, why they are here, and what is worth knowing.

The three are not measured the same way: one gives a safe-room price, one gives how long armour holds against small arms, and one has no measured result.

1Home security: perimeter, CCTV, bulletproof glass, safe rooms

No. 1 — Home security: perimeter, CCTV, bulletproof glass, safe rooms. On the lists of 7 of 10 AIs; median place there: 5.5. The AIs put it first because a home is the easiest, most predictable target, and Salman Khan's glass came after shots hit his building.

Did you know

  • Salman Khan already had 24-hour Y-plus police protection when his Mumbai building was shot at in April. Reports say the gang members fired when police security was not present. The glass came about eight months later. — Free Press Journal

    Source ↗ ✓ confirmed by several AIs
What it is
Protecting a home with fences, cameras, bulletproof glass and safe rooms.
Its edge
It guards the place attackers can most easily find and plan around.
Who should know
Useful to know because stars' homes are fixed targets that police cover alone does not fully protect.
  • Cost and protection offeredSafe rooms $25,000–$200,000+
Why it is here
  • A review of 76 studies found CCTV was linked to 13% less crime overall in places with cameras. That supports CCTV as part of home security, though it does not prove the whole setup works for a public figure. — College of Policing

Did you know
  • Besides glass, the building got high-resolution CCTV watching the street and razor wire fencing. The article says the glass lets him step onto the balcony and greet fans safely. — Free Press Journal

History
  • In 1966, Marie Van Brittan Brown filed a patent for a home security system using closed-circuit television. It was an unusual home use for a technology then mainly associated with the military. — (voice only)

What people say
  • Unfortunately, paranoia comes at a price, with such rooms costing as much as $1.5 million. — Rachel Mazanec, Chicago Agent Magazine

Where to go further
  • Open the FEMA P-361 safe room guide and skim the contents first. It is a long government PDF, so look for the parts on where to place a safe room and how big it should be.

Compare the top three ↓

2Armoured cars

No. 2 — Armoured cars. On the lists of 7 of 10 AIs; median place there: 3.5. The AIs ranked it second because it helps you survive an ambush but does not stop one from happening.

Did you know

  • The Rolls-Royce Armoured Car was introduced in 1914. It was built on the underframe of a famous luxury car and became a symbol of British military strength in World War I. Today's armoured limousines follow the same idea. — Armormax

What it is
Cars with armour and thick glass that protect people inside.
Its edge
It protects you while moving, which a house cannot do.
Who should know
Useful to know because it shows what travel protection can and cannot do against attacks.
  • Cost and protection offered~30 seconds vs small arms
Why it is here
  • Brazil recorded 29,296 newly armoured vehicles in 2023, a 13% rise from 25,916 in 2022 and a record since the group began tracking the figures in 1995. That points to wide use in a major film and sports market. — ABRABLIN

History
  • A 1917 robbery pushed Brink’s to add protection to its money cars: it followed them with convoy cars, then added steel panels to old school buses. The robbery helped spur the move toward armored transport. — (voice only)

Keep in mind
  • Armour adds weight, up to about 200 kg, and the thickest glass is 72 mm. The car's frame must carry the load without hurting handling, and many modern aluminium-frame cars need reinforcing first.

  • Armouring a car starts at about $40,000, and the price rises from there. Builders also say the car should blend in, because attackers who don't know its defences are a risk.

What people say
  • The industry is a non-stop competition between bullet and armour and the bullet always wins. — Leonard Yankelovich, Dartz Motorz (in Robb Report Singapore)

Compare the top three ↓

3Phone and digital privacy: private numbers, data-broker removal, SIM security

No. 3 — Phone and digital privacy: private numbers, data-broker removal, SIM security. On the lists of 7 of 10 AIs; median place there: 9.5. The AIs placed it third because it is cheap and keeps privacy, but no study shows it works and threats still arrive online.

Did you know

  • Europol reported ten hackers arrested for SIM-swapping attacks on celebrities. The page says they stole over USD 100 million in cryptocurrencies. They took over victims' phone numbers, not their phones. — Europol

What it is
Private numbers, removing personal data from sites, and safer SIM cards.
Its edge
It costs the least and takes away no physical privacy.
Who should know
Useful to know because many threats reach stars through phones and online accounts, not at the door.
  • Cost and protection offeredCheap; no study proves it
Why it is here
  • Ranvir Shorey said he received threats from 2 email accounts, illustrating why safer contact details may help but cannot stop threats sent through online channels. — The Indian Express

    Source ↗ ✓ confirmed by several AIs
  • In 2017, Instagram said a bug let someone access email addresses and phone numbers of some high-profile users. This shows the limits of relying on private contact details alone; it does not establish whether the suggested steps prevent threats. — TIME

History
  • In 2013, Snowden’s disclosures brought widespread surveillance into public debate. Two years later, the Signal Protocol began appearing in popular chat apps, helping bring end-to-end encryption to more users. — (voice only)

Keep in mind
  • Katrina Kaif and Vicky Kaushal were threatened on Instagram in 2022. Police filed a case for criminal intimidation and stalking and later arrested a man. Hiding contact details does not close a public social-media account.

What people say
  • Removal is rarely permanent. — Cape (data-broker removal guide)

Compare the top three ↓

The top three side by side

Home security: perimeter, CCTV, bulletproof glass, safe roomsArmoured carsPhone and digital privacy: private numbers, data-broker removal, SIM security
In the AIs' lists7 / 107 / 107 / 10
Cost and protection offeredSafe rooms $25,000–$200,000+~30 seconds vs small armsCheap; no study proves it
Put first by———

Places with the same number of AIs are ordered by their average place in the AIs' own lists.

03Worth knowing

What the AIs noticed while building the list.

Y+ has no fixed official size. Reports give 11 personnel for Shah Rukh Khan and about 25 for Salman Khan, and the MHA publishes no universal staffing table.

Noticed by:
Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi. Did not include: Meta, Gemini, Nemotron, DeepSeek, Wenxin.
Source ↗

State cover in India is usually free, but Shah Rukh Khan pays for his own Y+ detail, so 'state-provided' and 'privately paid' overlap.

Noticed by:
Included it: Claude, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi. Did not include: ChatGPT, Meta, Gemini, Nemotron, DeepSeek, Wenxin.
Source ↗

A two-person private detail costs about six times as much per year as a financed armoured car, but the car can only help you survive an attack, not prevent one.

Noticed by:
Included it: DeepSeek. Did not include: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Gemini, Nemotron, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi, Wenxin.
Source ↗

Evidence is thin by the industry's own admission: 34% of security professionals have no formal process to check whether their protection works.

Noticed by:
Included it: Claude, ChatGPT, StepFun. Did not include: Meta, Gemini, Nemotron, MiMo, Kimi, DeepSeek, Wenxin.
Source ↗

An academic model finds that giving up privacy does not automatically buy security, so a bigger detail is not always better value.

Noticed by:
Included it: ChatGPT. Did not include: Claude, Meta, Gemini, Nemotron, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi, DeepSeek, Wenxin.
Source ↗

04Questions people ask

What is Y plus security?

Y+ is an Indian threat-based protection tier of about 11 personnel, including 2–4 commandos, with escort vehicles. Reported counts vary and some protectees, like Shah Rukh Khan, pay for it.

Source ↗
How are celebrities protected?

In layers: threat assessment, advance work, home security, armoured cars and close protection, plus state cover such as Y+ where a threat is assessed. In 2025, 45% of organisations surveyed by ASIS gave daily close protection.

Source ↗
How do celebrities protect their privacy?

By limiting exposed details: data-broker opt-outs, business addresses, intermediaries and legal takedowns. Erasure is rarely permanent, and no study measures how well it works.

How do celebrities protect their phone numbers?

They keep the real number unlisted, use secondary or masked numbers held by managers, and change numbers after leaks. Free tools such as California's DROP show which brokers hold their data.

Source ↗

05How we counted

In plain words, no formulas.

1The question

Top 10 Ways Public Figures Are Kept Safe, from Y+ Cover to Armoured Cars

2Why this topic

Readers get one side-by-side view of what each protection measure does, what it costs and what it guards against, across countries. Each of these sources covers only part of that picture.

3Where it applies

Global; protection used for film stars, athletes and politicians in India, the US, the UK and Brazil, with state-provided and privately paid protection counted separately

4What we looked at

  • How widely the measure is used for public figures, with state and private protection counted separately
  • How it is used in the countries with the largest film and sports industries
  • Cost set against how much privacy the person gives up
  • Evidence that it works, from official reviews and academic security research
  • India Ministry of Home Affairs security categories (X, Y, Y+, Z, Z+) — Personnel, commandos and vehicles per tier, assigned by threat assessment. There is no official public staffing table, and counts
  • MHA official replies (PIB, RTI) — Confirms that cover is given 'on the basis of gravity of threat' and that costs are hard to separate across agency budgets
  • US Secret Service / DHS budget overview — Scale and cost of US federal protection: budget, positions and armoured vehicles
  • Metropolitan Police, Royalty and Specialist Protection (UK) — How UK close protection is organised; costings are not published

5Who ranked

The leading AIs, each building its own list of ten independently and naming a source for every place: Claude, ChatGPT, Meta, Gemini, Nemotron, MiMo, StepFun, Kimi, DeepSeek, Wenxin.

6How the places were set

The same entry written differently by different AIs was counted as one. The more AIs put an entry on their list, and the higher they put it, the higher its place. "AI agreement" shows how many of the AIs had it on their own list. Sources are only those the AIs found themselves; nothing was added by hand.

06Each AI's own list

🇺🇸 Claude10 places · 1 notes

The same question, answered by Claude alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.

  1. 1
    Mumbai (Bollywood), India

    India makes 2,605 feature films a year, nearly five times the US, and Mumbai is rated moderately safe by residents (56.1).

  2. 2
    Tokyo, Japan

    Japan makes 685 films a year and Tokyo scores 75.9 for safety, the best balance of the two.

    Source ↗
  3. 3
    Shanghai, China

    China made 612 films in 2024 (down 23% from 2023) and Shanghai scores 73.5 for safety.

  4. 4
    Los Angeles (Hollywood), US

    Hollywood makes 544 films a year, about a fifth of India's output, in a city where residents feel less safe than in Mumbai (46.2).

  5. 5
    Chennai (Kollywood), India

    Chennai is a southern Indian film hub and scores 59.8 for safety, higher than Mumbai.

  6. 6
    Hyderabad (Tollywood), India

    Hyderabad scores 57.4 for safety, between Mumbai and Chennai.

  7. 7
    Istanbul (Yeşilçam), Türkiye

    Türkiye produced 223 films in 2024, up 76, and Istanbul scores 52.0.

  8. 8
    Mexico City, Mexico

    Mexico made 240 films in 2024 and Mexico City sits 42nd of 60 in the EIU index.

  9. 9
    São Paulo, Brazil

    Brazil's output rose to 197 films from 161, but São Paulo scores 30.2 for safety.

  10. 10
    Lagos (Nollywood), Nigeria

    UNESCO counted 997 Nigerian films in 2015 but WIPO shows 50 for 2024, a gap that mostly reflects measurement.

What Claude noticed

Numbeo's 2026 mid-year top is Gulf cities: Ajman and Abu Dhabi tied at 88.6, with Doha at 84.6 the safest of the large cities.

🇺🇸 ChatGPT10 places · 2 notes

The same question, answered by ChatGPT alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.

  1. 1
    Tokyo, Japan

    Japan produced 676 feature films in 2023; Tokyo’s 2026 Numbeo Safety Index is 74.9.

  2. 2
    Seoul, South Korea

    South Korea is a major film market, and Seoul scored 75.3 on Numbeo’s 2026 Safety Index.

  3. 3
    Beijing, China

    China made 792 national feature films in 2023; Numbeo gives Beijing 74.9 for safety in 2026.

  4. 4
    Mumbai, India

    India’s 2,562 feature films in 2023 led WIPO’s country table, while Mumbai’s Numbeo safety score was 55.9.

  5. 5
    Los Angeles, United States

    The city’s 2026 Numbeo Safety Index is 45.9—a reminder that Hollywood’s global reach does not mean high perceived street safety.

  6. 6
    London, United Kingdom

    London’s 2021 EIU score put it 15th; the UK’s production base extends well beyond the capital.

  7. 7
    Paris, France

    Paris ranked 23rd in the EIU’s 2021 city assessment; Numbeo’s 2026 score is 42.0.

  8. 8
    Mexico City, Mexico

    Mexico is among the leading middle-income national film producers, but Mexico City’s recorded and perceived safety should not be collapsed into one number.

  9. 9
    Istanbul, Türkiye

    Türkiye appears among WIPO’s top 20 film-producing economies, but its national output cannot be assigned to Istanbul alone.

  10. 10
    São Paulo, Brazil

    Brazil is a substantial national film producer, but neither UNESCO country totals nor a city perception survey can say how much production belongs to São Paulo itself.

What ChatGPT noticed

The EIU’s Safe Cities Index uses a much broader lens than street crime: its 2021 edition assessed 60 cities across 76 indicators, including digital, health, infrastructure, personal and environmental security.

Hollywood is a production hub, not a synonym for the United States’ entire film industry; national film counts cannot be fairly treated as a Los Angeles-only tally.

🇺🇸 Gemini10 places · 2 notes

The same question, answered by Gemini alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.

  1. 1
    Tokyo, Japan

    Producing 535 feature films a year while ranking 5th worldwide in the EIU Safe Cities Index (and 1st on Earth for health security), Tokyo is the only global cinema hub that pairs top-five movie volume with top-five street safety.

    Source ↗
  2. 2
    Seoul, South Korea

    Home to a 438-film-a-year industry, Seoul edges out both Tokyo and Beijing on Numbeo's 2026 night-and-street Safety Index at 75.3, making it the safest-feeling major film capital in Asia.

  3. 3
    Beijing, China

    Anchoring a 775-film national industry that briefly overtook North America as the world's #1 box office ($8.9 billion peak), Beijing matches Tokyo with a 74.9 Numbeo Safety Index score.

    Source ↗
  4. 4
    Mumbai, India (Bollywood)

    Powering the world's #1 film-producing nation (1,813 feature films a year), Mumbai feels safer to residents (55.9 Safety Index) than Los Angeles (46.2) or London (45.0), even as targeted gang shootings like the October 2026 Juhu attack on Tiger Shroff expose high-profile extortion risks.

    Source ↗
  5. 5
    Toronto, Canada (Hollywood North)

    Scoring 82.2 out of 100 to rank 2nd in the entire world on the EIU Safe Cities Index (just 0.2 points behind Copenhagen), Toronto trades smaller domestic film totals (69+ features) for world-class infrastructure security (4th globally) that attracts massive US studio shoots.

    Source ↗
  6. 6
    Madrid, Spain

    With a 71.3 Numbeo Safety Index in 2026 and a 137-film national slate, Madrid is the safest major production hub in Europe—scoring 16 to 29 points safer on street perception than London or Paris.

  7. 7
    Los Angeles, United States (Hollywood)

    Although the US ranks 3rd in film volume (876 features) and 1st in box office, Los Angeles ranks 4th in the world for EIU Digital Security yet drops to a 46.2 Numbeo Safety Index (53.9 Crime Index) due to street-level gun and property crime.

  8. 8
    London, United Kingdom

    Generating 258 feature films a year and tying for 15th in the EIU Safe Cities Index, London suffers a sharp perception gap where street theft pushes its Numbeo Crime Index to 55.0 (Safety Index 45.0)—worse than both Los Angeles and Mumbai.

  9. 9
    Paris, France

    Europe's #1 film producer at 307 movies a year, Paris struggles with a 58.0 Numbeo Crime Index (42.0 Safety Index), ranking 88th globally for perceived street crime despite low lethal violence.

  10. 10
    Lagos, Nigeria (Nollywood)

    The world's #2 film machine churns out 1,547 features a year on fast turnarounds, but crews operate under a 69.1 Numbeo Crime Index (30.9 Safety Index)—the 28th highest urban crime perception in the world.

What Gemini noticed

The two biggest movie-producing countries on Earth—India (1,813 films/year) and Nigeria (1,547 films/year)—together make 3,360 films annually, nearly four times the United States' 876 films, yet neither Mumbai nor Lagos cracks the top 30 of the EIU Safe Cities Index.

Los Angeles ranks 4th in the entire world for Digital Security in the EIU Safe Cities Index (tied with San Francisco), even while lagging at 18th overall due to higher US gun homicide rates and lower personal security scores.

🇺🇸 Nemotron10 places · 1 notes

The same question, answered by Nemotron alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.

  1. 1
    Tokyo, Japan

    Produces 600+ features a year and scores 92.1 on EIU Safe Cities — the only megacity where you can walk a film set at 3 a.m. without a detail.

    Source ↗
  2. 2
    Seoul, South Korea

    K-content factory (500+ features) with a 90.3 EIU score — but the 'safe night' perception (Numbeo 81.2) hides a rising stalker-crime curve.

    Source ↗
  3. 3
    Singapore

    Tiny output (18 features) but 93.5 EIU crown — studios now fly talent in for 'safe haven' shoots rather than base production there.

    Source ↗
  4. 4
    Sydney, Australia

    220 features, 89.7 EIU, and a harbour that doubles as a secure perimeter — but bushfire smoke shut down 14 productions in 2023.

    Source ↗
  5. 5
    Toronto, Canada

    Hollywood North cranks 300+ features with 87.8 EIU — until the 2023 film-worker strike froze 40% of stages for 148 days.

    Source ↗
  6. 6
    London, UK

    550+ features (UK total) and 86.4 EIU — but knife crime in filming boroughs (Southwark, Tower Hamlets) runs 2.3× the city average.

    Source ↗
  7. 7
    Los Angeles, USA

    The brand says 'Hollywood' but only 180 features shoot in LA County now — 72.1 EIU and 54.3 Numbeo reveal the gap between myth and midnight.

    Source ↗
  8. 8
    Mumbai, India

    1,000+ features (India #1) but 58.2 Numbeo and 184 violent/100k — every outdoor shoot is a security operation, not a location scout.

  9. 9
    São Paulo, Brazil

    300+ Brazilian features anchor here — 52.7 Numbeo and 21.4 homicide/100k mean every star travels with armoured convoy.

    Source ↗
  10. 10
    Vancouver, Canada

    Matches Toronto's 87.8 EIU with 180 features — but rain loses 60 shoot days/year and the 'Hollywood North' tax credit war with Ontario creates instability.

    Source ↗

What Nemotron noticed

India produces the most features globally (1,048 in 2023) but zero Indian cities appear in the EIU Safe Cities Index — the world's biggest film factory operates outside the measured safety framework.

🇨🇳 MiMo10 places · 3 notes

The same question, answered by MiMo alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.

  1. 1
    Tokyo(Japan)

    The world's No. 2 film producer also tops the safety tables — 75.7 on Numbeo and a 92.0 Safe Cities score Hollywood never touches.

  2. 2
    Mumbai(Bollywood, India)

    The world's biggest film country by count, and its film capital has a murder rate (0.7 per lakh) most big cities envy — yet gunmen still reach its stars.

    Source ↗
  3. 3
    LosAngeles (Hollywood, US)

    Hollywood's homicide rate hit its lowest since 1959 — 5.9 per 100,000 — in the city whose industry is the world's biggest by money, not by films.

    Source ↗
  4. 4
    London(UK)

    97 homicides in 2025 — 1.1 per 100,000, under half of New York's 2.8 — in the city that doubles as Hollywood's backlot.

    Source ↗
  5. 5
    Seoul(South Korea)

    Numbeo gives Seoul 74.5 for safety just as Korean cinema shrinks to a projected 10–14 domestic releases a year.

    Source ↗
  6. 6
    HongKong (China)

    Crime so low Numbeo's index barely registers it (21.8 crime / 78.3 safety) while violent crime fell another 15.9% in 2025.

  7. 7
    Paris(France)

    France made 290 films in 2025 — Europe's busiest production machine — yet its capital scores a mediocre 42.1 for how safe people feel at night.

  8. 8
    MexicoCity (Mexico)

    Mexican cinema is breaking production records while its country's murder rate — 15.4 per 100,000 in 2025 — is falling at double-digit speed.

  9. 9
    Riode Janeiro (Brazil)

    Latin America's film capital gave 2025 its lowest tally in years — 965 homicides, 14.3 per 100,000 — still ten times London's rate.

    Source ↗
  10. 10
    Lagos(Nollywood, Nigeria)

    Roughly 2,500 films a year — the world's No. 2 by count — made in a city the Safe Cities Index places in the global bottom five.

    Source ↗

What MiMo noticed

Londonrecorded 1.1 homicides per 100,000 in 2025 versus New York's 2.8 — the world's shared studio backlot is now safer, on police data, than its American rival.

LosAngeles' 2025 homicide rate of 5.9 per 100,000 is its lowest since 1959 — the 'dangerous Hollywood' narrative is at odds with the city's own police statistics.

The'safest city' crown changes with the table: Tokyo led the EIU index in 2019 (92.0), Copenhagen in 2021 (82.4), and Numbeo's 2026 crowd-survey puts Doha first (85) — same question, three winners.

🇨🇳 StepFun10 places · 4 notes

The same question, answered by StepFun alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.

  1. 1
    Close protection officers and PSO escorts (state and private)

    India prices the same bodyguard by threat level: two armed guards at X, 36 at Z+.

    Source ↗
  2. 2
    Threat assessment and protective intelligence

    The Secret Service investigated roughly 10,000 threat cases in a year, up 40% — the cheapest measure here is doing the most work.

    Source ↗
  3. 3
    Armoured cars and bulletproof vehicles

    Brazil's middle class spent $660 million on bulletproof cars in one year — the country is the world's top producer of them.

    Source ↗
  4. 4
    Hardened homes — bulletproof glass, perimeter, CCTV, guards

    Salman Khan's balcony got bulletproof glass roughly eight months after bullets were fired at his gate.

  5. 5
    State security categories — X, Y, Y+, Z, Z+

    Y+ means 11 people follow you everywhere; the state usually pays — except Shah Rukh Khan, who pays about Rs 15 lakh a month for his.

    Source ↗
  6. 6
    Private executive protection firms (self-funded)

    Bollywood and realty bigwigs started scrambling for private protection the same week as the Juhu attack.

    Source ↗
  7. 7
    Neighbourhood patrols, vehicle checks and area watch

    After the Juhu firing police kept a continuous watch outside Salman, Aamir and Rohit Shetty's homes too — the only measure here that protects the neighbours.

    Source ↗
  8. 8
    Bulletproof vests and body armour

    A NIJ-tested vest starts around $299 — the cheapest ballistic protection on the list, and the only one that still works outside the car.

    Source ↗
  9. 9
    Digital privacy — private numbers, DND and number masking

    TRAI's DND app is free, and it is the only measure that addresses the calls and messages that usually come before the attack.

    Source ↗
  10. 10
    Legal remedies — injunctions, personality rights, restraining orders

    A Delhi court gave Aishwarya Rai Bachchan an ex-parte injunction over her name, face and voice: paper armour against deepfakes, not bullets.

What StepFun noticed

Y+ is the pivot of Indian protection: Kangana Ranaut became the first Bollywood star guarded by CRPF commandos in September 2020, with 10–11 commandos working in shifts round the clock.

Protection is not free of a psychological price: Rakesh Roshan, shot in 2000, said armed guards behind him in the car made him 'claustrophobic' and that he feared his own security might shoot him.

Almost a third of executive protection programmes are never evaluated: 34% of security professionals say they have no formal process to measure whether the protection they buy actually works.

The US Secret Service runs the largest protective machine in the world: a $3.2 billion FY2025 budget, 8,300 positions and 532 official vehicles, including 471 standard armoured dignitary vehicles.

🇨🇳 Kimi10 places · 4 notes

The same question, answered by Kimi alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.

  1. 1
    Z+ state security category (India)

    Up to 55 personnel, 10+ commandos and 5+ bulletproof vehicles around the clock — the heaviest shield any film figure can hold.

    Source ↗
  2. 2
    US Secret Service-style permanent federal protection (US)

    Roughly 300 agents on a sitting president — but the service protects officeholders and candidates, not celebrities by choice.

    Source ↗
  3. 3
    UK RaSP armed close protection and Special Escort Group (UK)

    Armed Met officers 24/7 for royals and ministers — and the Met won't even say what it costs.

    Source ↗
  4. 4
    Armoured vehicles (B4-B7 ballistic protection)

    A B6 car stops the 7.62 mm rifle rounds used in the Rohit Shetty and Tiger Shroff attacks — for $150,000-$650,000.

    Source ↗
  5. 5
    Y+ / Y state category cover (India)

    Eleven personnel for roughly ₹15 lakh a month — the workhorse cover that actually protects most Indian film stars.

    Source ↗
  6. 6
    Private close-protection teams (CPOs)

    The same protection, privately paid: £2.5M a year for Harry and Meghan's detail after the state cover ended.

  7. 7
    Residential hardening (bulletproof glass, access control, gates)

    After Bandra, Salman Khan's balcony got bulletproof glass — the cheapest fix that would have changed the April 2024 outcome.

  8. 8
    Threat-driven protective detail for private citizens (US model)

    When a real foreign threat lands, one year of protection for two former officials cost $12.28 million.

    Source ↗
  9. 9
    Advance work and route/travel security planning

    The attackers who hit Tiger Shroff knew his Sunday football routine — advance work is the layer that breaks that knowledge.

    Source ↗
  10. 10
    Digital privacy and data-broker removal

    The cheapest protection on the list — and the one that stops a fixer from buying a star's home address for a few dollars.

    Source ↗

What Kimi noticed

The gap between ranks 2 and 6 is a legal wall, not a budget one: the US Secret Service protects officeholders and major candidates by statute, so even billion-dollar film stars can only buy the private approximation — for roughly £2.5-3M a year.

A credible foreign threat costs about $6M per person per year to counter ($12.28M for Bolton and O'Brien combined) — several times the entire annual budget of a mid-size police station.

India spends an estimated ₹33 lakh a month on one Z+ protectee — and critics note VIP cover diverts officers so severely that some police stations run below half strength.

The Tiger Shroff attack shows the thinnest layer is knowledge of routine: shooters waited 45 minutes outside a Sunday football ground. Armoured cars stop bullets; only advance work and changed routines stop the ambush itself.

🇨🇳 DeepSeek10 places · 1 notes

The same question, answered by DeepSeek alone. The final list above combines all the AIs.

  1. 1
    Tokyo

    581–676 local features and an 80.0 EIU score — the rare film capital that also feels safe at night.

  2. 2
    Beijing

    686 features in UNESCO's latest-available count and a 74.9 safety score — output and perceived safety nearly match Tokyo.

  3. 3
    Seoul

    Only 174 features, but a 75.3 safety score puts it ahead of Tokyo on Numbeo.

  4. 4
    Mumbai

    The world's most productive film city makes 746–1,907 features a year, yet its safety score is 56.1.

  5. 5
    Los Angeles

    Hollywood's US output is 510–791 features, but its safety score is 46.2 — fame without a safe walk home.

  6. 6
    Paris

    298 French features and a 42.1 safety score: Europe's film capital is not its safest.

  7. 7
    Chennai

    More than 200 Tamil films and a 59.8 safety score — India's safer film hub.

  8. 8
    London

    £1.36bn of UK feature production and a 44.7 safety score — a global hub with a mid-table night-time feel.

  9. 9
    Hong Kong

    Only 46 local features, but a 78.6 safety score — the safest film city on this list.

  10. 10
    Lagos

    About 997 Nollywood features in UNESCO's latest-available count and a 30.9 safety score — the widest output-safety gap here.

What DeepSeek noticed

Mumbai's EIU score of 54.4 ranks 50th, even though India is the largest feature-film producer in UNESCO's latest-available table.